All You Need To Know About Dota 2 Pro SumaiL’s Lawsuit Against Evil Geniuses

The world of esports is no stranger to drama and disputes, but one recent legal battle has sent shockwaves through the Dota 2 community. Syed “SumaiL” Hassan, a prominent Dota 2 professional player, has taken his former team, Evil Geniuses (EG), to court, alleging breach of contract and fraud. 

This high-profile case has raised numerous questions about player contracts, financial dealings, and the relationships between players and organizations in the competitive gaming scene. In this article, we’ll delve into the details of SumaiL’s lawsuit against EG and the implications it holds for the esports world.

The Genesis of the Dispute

The roots of this legal tussle can be traced back to December 2019 when SumaiL initiated legal proceedings against Evil Geniuses. Central to this dispute is a stock grant awarded to SumaiL back in September 2016. At that time, SumaiL had achieved a top-three finish with EG at The International 2016 (TI6), cementing his status as one of the game’s elite players.

The lawsuit contends that SumaiL was given 400,000 shares of stock by EG in 2016. When EG underwent an acquisition by Peak6 Strategic Capital in May 2019, these shares were converted into 265,338 units of common stock and 106,667 units of restricted common stock. The contentious issue arises from the fact that units of preferred stock were exclusively available to Peak6 members, and SumaiL was left in the dark about the transformation of his holdings during the merger.

The Unraveling of the Relationship

Following the acquisition by Peak6, SumaiL entered into a new contract with EG in August 2019. This contract guaranteed him a monthly salary and bonus payments until August 2020. However, the relationship took a sharp turn after EG’s underwhelming performance at The International 2019 (TI9). SumaiL found himself out of favor and excluded from the team’s roster for the upcoming season.

In a bid to continue competing, SumaiL agreed to an amendment to his player contract in September 2019. This amendment allowed him to participate in the qualifiers for the MDL Chengdu Major 2019 but came at a steep cost. His monthly salary was slashed from $20,000 to just $2,000, and he was limited to competing only in Dota Major qualifiers. If SumaiL chose to terminate the contract, he would be required to pay a hefty one-time fee of $125,000. Crucially, this amendment was meant to protect SumaiL’s ownership stake in EG if he chose to join another esports team.

The Shady Mutual Release Agreement

The legal quagmire deepened when SumaiL was presented with a “Mutual Release Agreement” that contradicted the terms previously agreed upon. Instead of safeguarding his ownership stake, this agreement allegedly imposed onerous and unjust conditions on SumaiL. It is alleged that this agreement contained numerous irregularities, ambiguities, and draconian obligations that aimed to coerce SumaiL into forfeiting his entire stock in EG.

Unit Purchase Agreement: A Controversial Turn

In February 2020, SumaiL faced another pivotal moment when presented with a “Unit Purchase Agreement.” This agreement sought to liquidate his interest in EG for a proposed purchase price of $1 million. The deal comprised an initial payment of $300,000 and a deferred payment of up to $700,000, payable upon SumaiL’s retirement or after 1st March 2023, whichever came later.

The lawsuit contends that SumaiL was kept in the dark regarding the extent of his ownership stake and accuses EG of obscuring the implications of the agreements’ forfeiture clauses. More pointedly, it asserts that SumaiL received no compensation for his shares despite his unwavering commitment and dedication to the organization’s esports endeavors.

Denials and the Road Ahead

Evil Geniuses has vehemently denied all allegations made in SumaiL’s lawsuit, setting the stage for a jury trial scheduled for June 26, 2023. The legal battle between SumaiL and his former organization underscores the intricate and sometimes contentious relationships that can exist within the esports industry.

This case serves as a stark reminder that the competitive gaming world, while captivating and exhilarating, is not immune to off-field disputes that can profoundly impact the careers, earnings, and futures of its star players. As the esports community awaits the outcome of this legal showdown, it remains a compelling and cautionary tale for all players, teams, and organizations involved in the industry.

Also Read: 3 Reasons Why Donald Mustard’s Retirement Might Impact Fortnite Gaming